![]() The relevant section of the school code states that “he board of school directors in any school district may…provide for the free transportation of any pupil to and from the…school in which he is lawfully enrolled…” 24 P.S. Instead, it contested that it was required to provide transportation services to and from more than one parent’s residence, whereas the parents wanted transportation services to be provided from both parents’ residences per their custody arrangement. ![]() The school district elected to provide transportation to its students therefore, it did not contest that it was required to provide this student transportation. In this case, the school district had been attempting to limit all students’ transportation services by designating only one residence per student from which to provide transportation to and from school, even when a child’s parents lived separately but both within the school district’s boundaries. School Dist., the court issued its decision, answering yes to both questions. The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania recently agreed to review the questions of (1) does the Public School Code of 1949 require school districts to provide transportation services to a resident pupil to and from more than one location within the school district and (2) can a child have more than one residence for the purposes of transportation services under Section 1361 of the Public School Code of 1949. Click here to download the article in pdf format
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |